(1) I have just finished watching The Wolfman and I’m considered contacting Consumer Direct – because I distinctly remember seeing Emily Blunt half-naked in the trailer (for a split second, looking over her bare shoulder, on her lips a half-smile pregnant with the promise of things to come).
Everyone knows that a director who permits partial nudity in a film trailer is contractually obliged to some full frontal nudity in the movie itself. Everyone, that is, but Joe Johnston who insists (for reasons best known to him) on keeping the lovely Ms Blunt (and everyone else, for that matter) fully clothed for the movie’s entire duration. What do they teach in film school these days?
(2) Even disregarding this betrayal, this was probably one of the worst movies I’ve seen in a while. Dull, dark and mind-numbingly predictable from about ten minutes into the proceedings all the way to its all-too-obvious conclusion. Usually productions of this sort are partially redeemed by some gratuitous violence or wanton sexuality (or by a gratuitously wanton display of violent sexuality) but Joe Johnston gives us nothing to make our pulses quicken or our hearts race. His creatures fail to terrify, the deaths fail to move us, the dismemberments leave one cold. One wonders how Johnson was able to cram so many A-listers into this turkey: Anthony Hopkins, Benicio del Toro, Hugo Weaving, Max von Sydow and the aforementioned Ms Blunt (she of the unfulfilled promise) – all of them limping, grunting and grimacing their way through this tedious disaster.
(3) One more reason to find this film annoying: Its insistence on remaining faithful to the standard themes of werewolf mythology without any attempt to express these in more modern terms. The wolfman transforms on nights of the full moon, no explanation required. Are we supposed to assume this is a gravitational effect or is the change triggered by some properties of moonlight itself? The (presumably) infected or, more likely, cursed wolfmen undergo the traditional transmogrification: growing taller, hairier and less articulate and flagrantly violating the Law of Conservation of Mass. Where does all that extra Wolfman bulk come from? Whither does it go? Some might argue that these are minor quibbles but I would contend that a public bombarded with these simply ridiculous conceits is far more likely to fall prey to the illogical in “real life”. The fable wedges the door open, alters folk science, and all the Really Bad Ideas rush in.
(4) I honestly cannot remember why I ever considered Benicio Del Toro worth watching. His character in this film is supposedly a famous stage actor but his listless delivery of some famous lines from Shakespeare leaves us with the impression that he would make the world’s worst Hamlet (assuming anyone were foolish enough to offer him the role). To make things worse, I found his murky accent distracting (and difficult to reconcile with his character’s history). My mind kept wandering and I couldn’t help feeling that something about his face reminded me of Terence Howard (an actor with a lot more personality and, apparently, considerably more talent)
[It appears the "unrated Director's Cut" is 16 minutes longer. Lot's of room there for redemption - and I might have to reserve final judgement on Del Toro until I've seen Soderbergh's Che.]
